---
title: Sudarsky classification
summary: A theoretical scheme from 2000 that sorts giant planets into five classes by the temperature of their upper atmospheres, which decides what clouds can form and so how much light, and what colour, the planet reflects.
science_status: [model, sim]
categories: [Gas giants, Planet classes, Atmospheric science, Classification schemes]
aliases: [Sudarsky classes, Sudarsky class, Sudarsky's gas giant classification, Sudarsky class I, Sudarsky class II, Sudarsky class III, Sudarsky class IV, Sudarsky class V, Class I gas giant, Class II gas giant, Class III gas giant, Class IV gas giant, Class V gas giant, Jovian class, Water-cloud giant, Clear giant, Alkali-metal giant, Silicate-cloud giant, Roaster]
infobox:
  type: planet_class
  name: Sudarsky classification
  image: File:Sudarsky_class_III_clear_giant_sim.png
  caption: "Sim render: the sim's Clear-Blue temperate giant (GGT-CB-AZ-1), its reading of Sudarsky Class III"
  level: Classification scheme (five classes)
  series: G (gas giant)
  science_status: model
  literature_equivalent: "Sudarsky, Burrows and Pinto (2000), ApJ 538, 885; extended by Sudarsky, Burrows and Hubeny (2003), ApJ 588, 1121"
  applies_to: "Irradiated hydrogen-helium giant planets of roughly Jupiter mass and solar composition"
  defining_criteria: "Effective temperature of the upper atmosphere, which sets the highest principal cloud deck; low surface gravity (below about 10 m/s²) moves a planet from Class IV to Class V"
  classes:
    - {class: I, name: "Jovian (ammonia clouds)", effective_temperature_k: "below about 150", top_cloud_deck: "NH3 ice, over deeper NH4SH and H2O decks", bond_albedo_model: 0.57, expected_look: "Bright, banded, cream to brown", examples: "Jupiter, Saturn"}
    - {class: II, name: "Water clouds", effective_temperature_k: "about 250", top_cloud_deck: "H2O ice", bond_albedo_model: 0.81, expected_look: "Very bright white", examples: "None confirmed"}
    - {class: III, name: "Clear", effective_temperature_k: "about 350 and above, to about 900", top_cloud_deck: "None in the upper atmosphere; silicates at about 50 bar", bond_albedo_model: 0.12, expected_look: "Dark, featureless, blue", examples: "None measured in reflected light"}
    - {class: IV, name: "Alkali metals", effective_temperature_k: "about 900 to 1,500", top_cloud_deck: "Silicates at 5 to 10 bar, under gaseous Na and K", bond_albedo_model: 0.03, expected_look: "Almost black", examples: "51 Pegasi b class hot Jupiters"}
    - {class: V, name: "Silicate clouds", effective_temperature_k: "above about 1,500 (lower for low-gravity planets)", top_cloud_deck: "Silicates high in the atmosphere", bond_albedo_model: 0.55, expected_look: "Bright grey-white", examples: "None confirmed; most hot Jupiters measured are dark"}
  bond_albedo: {value: "0.03 to 0.81", unit: dimensionless, source: model, note: "Fiducial models around a Sun-like (G2V) star"}
  cloud_and_haze_species: "NH3 (about 150 K), NH4SH (about 200 K), H2O (about 270 K at a few bar), sulfides and chlorides (about 700 to 1,000 K), silicates and iron (above about 1,500 K)"
  sim_equivalent: "GGC cold giants (Class I); GGT temperate giants carry Sudarsky labels (TN, WC, CB, HZ); GGH hot giants are not mapped to IV or V"
  real_examples: "Jupiter and Saturn (Class I). Hot Jupiters measured in reflected light: TrES-2b, WASP-12b (dark), Kepler-7b (cloudy, brighter), HD 189733b (blue)"
  sim_source: "Temperate gas giant properties module (its Sudarsky class boundaries) and the temperate giant science reference"
  rendered_example: "GGT-CB-AZ-1 (sim render, procedural gas giant generator)"
  last_verified: "2026-09-27, writer B, against the arXiv text of Sudarsky et al. 2000"
sim:
  entity: classification.sudarsky
refs:
  - id: sudarsky2000
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Sudarsky, given: David}, {family: Burrows, given: Adam}, {family: Pinto, given: Philip}]
    title: "Albedo and Reflection Spectra of Extrasolar Giant Planets"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal
    volume: 538
    page: 885-903
    issued: 2000
    DOI: 10.1086/309160
  - id: sudarsky2003
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Sudarsky, given: David}, {family: Burrows, given: Adam}, {family: Hubeny, given: Ivan}]
    title: "Theoretical Spectra and Atmospheres of Extrasolar Giant Planets"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal
    volume: 588
    page: 1121-1148
    issued: 2003
    DOI: 10.1086/374331
  - id: marley1999
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Marley, given: Mark S.}, {family: Gelino, given: Christopher}, {family: Stephens, given: Denise}, {family: Lunine, given: Jonathan I.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "Reflected Spectra and Albedos of Extrasolar Giant Planets. I. Clear and Cloudy Atmospheres"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal
    volume: 513
    page: 879-893
    issued: 1999
    DOI: 10.1086/306881
  - id: cahoy2010
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Cahoy, given: Kerri L.}, {family: Marley, given: Mark S.}, {family: Fortney, given: Jonathan J.}]
    title: "Exoplanet Albedo Spectra and Colors as a Function of Planet Phase, Separation, and Metallicity"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal
    volume: 724
    page: 189-214
    issued: 2010
    DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/189
  - id: marley2015
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Marley, given: Mark S.}, {family: Robinson, given: Tyler D.}]
    title: "On the Cool Side: Modeling the Atmospheres of Brown Dwarfs and Giant Planets"
    container-title: Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    volume: 53
    page: 279-323
    issued: 2015
    DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122522
  - id: weidenschilling1973
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Weidenschilling, given: S. J.}, {family: Lewis, given: J. S.}]
    title: "Atmospheric and cloud structures of the Jovian planets"
    container-title: Icarus
    volume: 20
    page: 465-476
    issued: 1973
    DOI: 10.1016/0019-1035(73)90019-5
  - id: carlson2016
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Carlson, given: R. W.}, {family: Baines, given: K. H.}, {family: Anderson, given: M. S.}, {family: Filacchione, given: G.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "Chromophores from photolyzed ammonia reacting with acetylene: Application to Jupiter's Great Red Spot"
    container-title: Icarus
    volume: 274
    page: 106-115
    issued: 2016
    DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.03.008
  - id: li2018
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Li, given: Liming}, {family: Jiang, given: X.}, {family: West, given: R. A.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "Less absorbed solar energy and more internal heat for Jupiter"
    container-title: Nature Communications
    volume: 9
    page: 3709
    issued: 2018
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06107-2
  - id: matthews2024
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Matthews, given: Elisabeth C.}, {family: Carter, given: Aarynn L.}, {family: Pathak, given: Prashant}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "A temperate super-Jupiter imaged with JWST in the mid-infrared"
    container-title: Nature
    volume: 633
    page: 789-792
    issued: 2024
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07837-8
  - id: bell2023
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Bell, given: Taylor J.}, {family: Welbanks, given: Luis}, {family: Schlawin, given: Everett}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "Methane throughout the atmosphere of the warm exoplanet WASP-80b"
    container-title: Nature
    volume: 623
    page: 709-712
    issued: 2023
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06687-0
  - id: kipping2011
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Kipping, given: David M.}, {family: Spiegel, given: David S.}]
    title: "Detection of visible light from the darkest world"
    container-title: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
    volume: 417
    page: L88-L92
    issued: 2011
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01127.x
  - id: bell2017
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Bell, given: Taylor J.}, {family: Nikolov, given: Nikolay}, {family: Cowan, given: Nicolas B.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "The Very Low Albedo of WASP-12b from Spectral Eclipse Observations with Hubble"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal Letters
    volume: 847
    page: L2
    issued: 2017
    DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa876c
  - id: demory2013
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Demory, given: Brice-Olivier}, {family: de Wit, given: Julien}, {family: Lewis, given: Nikole}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "Inference of Inhomogeneous Clouds in an Exoplanet Atmosphere"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal Letters
    volume: 776
    page: L25
    issued: 2013
    DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L25
  - id: evans2013
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Evans, given: Thomas M.}, {family: Pont, given: Frédéric}, {family: Sing, given: David K.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "The Deep Blue Color of HD 189733b: Albedo Measurements with Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph at Visible Wavelengths"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal Letters
    volume: 772
    page: L16
    issued: 2013
    DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/772/2/L16
  - id: knutson2007
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Knutson, given: Heather A.}, {family: Charbonneau, given: David}, {family: Allen, given: Lori E.}, {literal: "et al."}]
    title: "A map of the day-night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b"
    container-title: Nature
    volume: 447
    page: 183-186
    issued: 2007
    DOI: 10.1038/nature05782
  - id: esteves2015
    type: article-journal
    author: [{family: Esteves, given: Lisa J.}, {family: De Mooij, given: Ernst J. W.}, {family: Jayawardhana, given: Ray}]
    title: "Changing Phases of Alien Worlds: Probing Atmospheres of Kepler Planets with High-Precision Photometry"
    container-title: The Astrophysical Journal
    volume: 804
    page: 150
    issued: 2015
    DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/150
images_wanted:
  - file: File:Sudarsky_class_III_clear_giant_sim.png
    subject: "The sim's Clear-Blue temperate giant, a featureless deep blue globe darkening toward its limb"
    source: sim
    source_ref: "GGQA:ggt_temperate_clear_blue_water_cloud_final/GGT-CB-AZ-1_sphere_20.png"
    credit: "Pax Abyssi (sim render, procedural gas giant generator)"
    note: "900 x 900 desk-oracle render from the same shaders the game uses; no HUD. Caption must say sim render."
  - file: File:Sudarsky_class_II_water_cloud_giant_sim.png
    subject: "The sim's water-cloud temperate giant, a pale blue-white banded globe"
    source: sim
    source_ref: "GGQA:ggt_temperate_clear_blue_water_cloud_final/GGT-WC-PB-2_sphere_20.png"
    credit: "Pax Abyssi (sim render, procedural gas giant generator)"
  - file: File:Sudarsky_class_ladder_diagram.svg
    subject: "Diagram: five spheres in a row, Class I (cream and brown bands) to Class V (bright grey), each with its effective temperature, highest cloud deck and model Bond albedo beneath, and a temperature axis with the NH3, H2O, sulfide and silicate condensation points marked"
    source: other
    note: "shot list: to be drawn as an SVG in the site's style from the table on this page"
  - file: File:HD_189733b_deep_blue_artist_impression.jpg
    subject: "Artist's impression of the deep blue hot Jupiter HD 189733b beside its star"
    source: esa-hubble
    page_url: https://esahubble.org/images/heic1312a/
    credit: "NASA, ESA, M. Kornmesser"
    licence: "CC BY 4.0 (ESA/Hubble usage terms)"
---

The **Sudarsky classification** sorts giant planets into five classes by the temperature of their upper atmospheres. It was proposed in 2000 by David Sudarsky, Adam Burrows and Philip Pinto, who computed how much light, and which colours, giant planets of different temperatures should reflect :cite[sudarsky2000]. Temperature decides which substances can condense into clouds high in a giant's atmosphere, and the clouds, or their absence, decide how the planet looks: cream and banded, brilliant white, dark blue, nearly black or bright grey. The scheme is a model prediction, made when no exoplanet had yet been seen in reflected light, and it is still the clearest way to understand why a giant planet's appearance follows its temperature.

## Why temperature decides the look

A giant planet has no surface. Its hydrogen and helium atmosphere gets hotter with depth, and a cloud forms wherever the temperature at some pressure falls below the condensation point of a trace gas. Every species condenses at its own temperature, so each giant has a stack of possible cloud decks and a planet's temperature sets which one sits highest. That top deck scatters starlight back to space; what lies above it absorbs. Whether a planet is bright or dark, banded or plain, is decided in the top few bars of its atmosphere :cite[marley2015].

Sudarsky and colleagues ordered their classes by **effective temperature**, $T_\mathrm{eff}$, the temperature of a black body that would radiate the planet's total emitted power. That includes both the starlight the planet absorbs and the heat still leaking from its interior since it formed:

$$
T_\mathrm{eff}^4 \approx T_\mathrm{int}^4 + T_\mathrm{eq}^4, \qquad T_\mathrm{eq} = \left[\frac{(1 - A_B)\,L_\star}{16\pi\sigma a^2}\right]^{1/4}
$$

Here $T_\mathrm{int}$ is the temperature that the internal heat alone would give, $T_\mathrm{eq}$ the equilibrium temperature set by the star, $A_B$ the Bond albedo (the fraction of all incoming light reflected), $L_\star$ the star's luminosity, $a$ the orbital distance and $\sigma$ the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. For a hot Jupiter the stellar term dominates. For an old giant far from its star the two terms can be similar: Jupiter's equilibrium temperature is about 102 K with its measured Bond albedo of 0.503, but it radiates 7.5 W/m² of internal heat as well, which lifts its effective temperature to about 125 K :cite[li2018]. A young or very massive giant can be far warmer than its orbit alone would suggest, and it is $T_\mathrm{eff}$ that decides its class.

## The five classes

Each class is named for a representative model, and the boundaries between them are soft. The Bond albedos below are the paper's fiducial values for a planet around a Sun-like star :cite[sudarsky2000].

| Class | Name | Effective temperature | Highest cloud deck | Model Bond albedo | Expected look |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Jovian | below about 150 K | Ammonia ice, over ammonium hydrosulfide and water decks | 0.57 | Bright, banded, cream and brown |
| II | Water clouds | about 250 K | Water ice | 0.81 | Brilliant white |
| III | Clear | about 350 K and above | None high up; silicates near 50 bar | 0.12 | Dark, featureless, blue |
| IV | Alkali metals | about 900 to 1,500 K | Silicates at 5 to 10 bar, under sodium and potassium gas | 0.03 | Nearly black |
| V | Silicate clouds | above about 1,500 K, or lower if gravity is weak | Silicates high in the atmosphere | 0.55 | Bright grey-white |

The gaps in the temperature column are real. The paper gives Class II as "about 250 K" and Class III as "about 350 K and above"; between them the water deck thins out, and between Class III and Class IV sulfide and chloride clouds may start to form at depth. The albedos also depend on the star. Around an M4 dwarf, whose light peaks in the near-infrared where giants absorb strongly, a Class III planet reflects about 1% of the energy it receives; around an A8 star, whose light is bluer, it reflects closer to 20% :cite[sudarsky2000].

::figure{src="File:Sudarsky_class_ladder_diagram.svg" size=wide alt="Five spheres from cream and banded through white, deep blue and near-black to bright grey, each labelled with its effective temperature, top cloud deck and model Bond albedo" caption="Diagram: the five Sudarsky classes, from the ammonia-cloud Jovian class to the silicate-cloud Class V, with the condensation points that separate them."}

## The chemistry of each deck

**Class I** is Jupiter and Saturn. Their highest clouds are ammonia ice near 0.7 bar, with a deck of ammonium hydrosulfide (NH4SH, made when ammonia meets hydrogen sulfide) near 2 bar and water clouds deeper still, at around 5 bar :cite[weidenschilling1973]. Ammonia ice is white. The browns, reds and oranges of Jupiter's belts come from a small admixture of coloured compounds, the chromophores, whose chemistry is still not settled. One laboratory candidate is the product of ammonia broken apart by sunlight reacting with acetylene, which matches the colour of the Great Red Spot :cite[carlson2016]. Because the chromophores absorb blue and ultraviolet light, a real Class I giant is less reflective than a clean ammonia-cloud model: Jupiter's Bond albedo, measured by Cassini, is 0.503 :cite[li2018].

**Class II** planets are too warm for ammonia to condense, so gaseous ammonia sits above a deck of water ice. Water ice clouds high in the atmosphere reflect nearly every visible colour well, and gaseous absorbers have little path length above them to work on, which is why the paper predicted Class II to be the most reflective of all, with a Bond albedo of about 0.81 :cite[sudarsky2000]. Such a world would look like a larger, whiter Venus.

**Class III** is too warm for water to condense in the upper atmosphere and too cool for anything else. It is described in its own section below.

**Class IV** planets, the hotter "roasters" such as 51 Pegasi b, are hot enough that silicate rock condenses into clouds, but those clouds lie at 5 to 10 bar. Above them, sodium and potassium atoms are gaseous, and their strong absorption lines, together with water and other molecules, soak up nearly all visible and near-infrared light before it reaches the silicate deck. The paper's Class IV model reflects only about 3% of the incoming energy, making these the darkest planets in the scheme :cite[sudarsky2000].

**Class V** planets are hotter still, above about 1,500 K, or have weak gravity, below about 10 m/s², which puffs up the atmosphere. In both cases the silicate deck forms high enough to reflect light before the alkali metals can absorb it, and the model Bond albedo climbs back to about 0.55. The paper noted that a low-mass, inflated roaster such as HD 209458 b could qualify for Class V below 1,500 K for this reason :cite[sudarsky2000].

## Class III, explained

A Class III giant has, in the model, no principal cloud deck anywhere in its upper atmosphere. Starlight penetrates deep, and what happens to it along the way sets the planet's colour. Hydrogen molecules scatter blue light back out efficiently, as the air does in Earth's sky, because Rayleigh scattering grows as the inverse fourth power of wavelength. Sodium and potassium absorb strongly in the yellow, red and near-infrared, and methane, water and collisions between hydrogen molecules take out most of the rest of the infrared. In the model the planet's spherical albedo stays near 0.6 in the ultraviolet and blue but drops below 0.1 through the red :cite[sudarsky2000]. The result is a planet that returns mainly blue light and little else: dark overall, with a Bond albedo of about 0.12, similar to the Moon's, and blue in colour.

It would also be close to featureless. On Jupiter the belts and zones are visible because clouds of different heights and tints trace the jets. A Class III giant still has jets and storms, but with no cloud tops to mark them the flow is invisible in reflected light.

Two caveats matter. The 2000 models did not include photochemical hazes, the smog that ultraviolet light makes from methane and other molecules high in an atmosphere; the paper showed that even small amounts of such material can lower the blue albedo substantially :cite[sudarsky2000], so a real Class III planet could be greyer or browner than the model. And the paper noted that thin sulfide or chloride clouds a few bars down, which its chemistry did not expect to be thick, would raise the albedo if present. Later models that follow haze and cloud chemistry in more detail give a range of possible colours for giants at these temperatures :cite[cahoy2010]. No giant planet in this temperature range has yet had its reflected colour measured, so the blue Class III giant remains a prediction. JWST has begun to probe the chemistry of such planets: WASP-80 b, at about 825 K near the top of the Class III range, shows methane throughout its atmosphere :cite[bell2023], and methane bands are among the features the Class III models predict.

::figure{src="File:Sudarsky_class_III_clear_giant_sim.png" size=medium alt="A featureless deep blue planet on a black background, darkening toward its edge" caption="Sim render: the sim's Clear-Blue temperate giant, drawn as the Class III model describes it, with no visible bands and gentle limb darkening."}

## How the classes compare with observation

**Class I** is confirmed by the Solar System, with the refinement that chromophores make real ammonia-cloud giants darker than clean models. The paper's own Jupiter model, with chromophores added, gave a Bond albedo of 0.42 to 0.44 :cite[sudarsky2000], below the 0.503 that Cassini later measured :cite[li2018].

**Class II** has no confirmed member. One of the coldest giant exoplanets imaged directly, epsilon Indi Ab, has an effective temperature of about 275 K, almost all of it from internal heat since its equilibrium temperature is below 100 K. JWST found it bright at 10 to 15 micrometres but could not detect it between 3.5 and 5 micrometres, which points to an absorber or cloud the models do not yet capture :cite[matthews2024]. Planets like it are where water clouds should first be found.

**Classes IV and V** can be tested, because hot Jupiters reflect enough light to measure. Most are dark, as Class IV predicts. TrES-2 b has a geometric albedo of about 0.025 in the Kepler band, darker than coal :cite[kipping2011]; most hot Jupiters measured by Kepler have geometric albedos below 0.25 :cite[esteves2015]. The hottest are not the bright Class V worlds the scheme expected. WASP-12 b, one of the hottest known, has a geometric albedo below 0.064 between 290 and 570 nanometres; the measurement rules out both a reflective aluminium-oxide haze and a clear, Rayleigh-scattering atmosphere, and fits thermal emission with only weak scattering by atomic hydrogen and helium :cite[bell2017]. Its dayside appears to be free of cloud. Clouds do appear where hot Jupiters are cooler: Kepler-7 b has a geometric albedo of 0.35 in the Kepler band, and its brightest point sits west of the point facing its star, where reflective clouds, possibly silicates, collect on the cooler morning side :cite[demory2013]. HD 189733 b, whose dayside brightness temperature is about 1,200 K :cite[knutson2007], is deep blue, with a geometric albedo of 0.40 between 290 and 450 nanometres and below 0.12 from 450 to 570 nanometres, a pattern that fits a reflective haze or cloud layer with sodium absorbing the longer wavelengths :cite[evans2013]. That is the colour the paper predicted for Class III, found on a planet hot enough to be Class IV.

::figure{src="File:HD_189733b_deep_blue_artist_impression.jpg" size=medium alt="Artist's impression of a deep blue gas giant close to a bright star" caption="Artist's concept: HD 189733 b, the first exoplanet whose visible colour was measured, a deep blue. Credit: NASA, ESA, M. Kornmesser."}

## Limits of the scheme

The classes come from one-dimensional models that treat the whole dayside as a single column in chemical equilibrium. Real hot Jupiters have hot daysides and cool nightsides, winds that carry clouds between them, and photochemistry that equilibrium models leave out. A 2003 follow-up by Sudarsky, Burrows and Ivan Hubeny computed full spectra for known planets and traced how stellar type, orbital distance, clouds, mass and gravity change them :cite[sudarsky2003]. Even so, the scheme treats each class as one planet: mass, metallicity, the host star's spectrum and the particle sizes of the clouds all change the albedo within a class, sometimes by more than the difference between classes :cite[sudarsky2000]. An earlier set of models from 1999 had given 500 K and 1,000 K giants Bond albedos of 0.30 to 0.44 :cite[marley1999]; the 2000 paper traced its much lower values to the alkali metals it added :cite[sudarsky2000], which shows how much depends on the chemistry chosen. Research papers today rarely assign a planet a Sudarsky class. They describe giants by equilibrium temperature and by the cloud species that measured spectra reveal, and the International Astronomical Union has no official classification of giant planets. The Sudarsky classes remain the best-known summary of why a giant's looks follow its temperature, and a good first guess for a planet whose spectrum has not been taken.

:::callout{type=sim title="In Pax Abyssi"}
The sim's giants are sorted first by temperature into cold (GGC), temperate (GGT) and hot (GGH) types, then into subtypes. The **temperate giants** carry Sudarsky labels in the sim's code: Transition (GGT-TN, 150 to 250 K), Water-Cloud (GGT-WC, 250 to 350 K), Clear-Blue (GGT-CB, 350 K and above, Bond albedo 0.10 to 0.20, the sim's Class III) and Hazy (GGT-HZ, a Class III giant under photochemical haze). The **cold giants** are all Class I ammonia-cloud worlds, split further by the sim's own chemistry-based subtypes. The **hot giants** are split by dayside temperature into six looks of the sim's own naming, which are not mapped onto Sudarsky's Classes IV and V. The sim classifies by equilibrium temperature rather than effective temperature.

Every temperate subtype has a look in the procedural gas giant generator (BUILT, awaiting the owner's verdict), which grows each giant's cloud field from a simulated wind field and lights it with limb darkening under a thin haze. The Clear-Blue look in the figure above is the sim's reading of the Class III model: dark blue, bandless, softening toward the limb. Of the 8,742 planets in the 5,159 generated systems of the naked-eye sky, 260 are temperate giants, 30 of them Clear-Blue.
:::

## See also

- [[Gas giant]]
- [[Cold gas giant]]
- [[Temperate gas giant]]
- [[Hot Jupiter]]
- [[Ice giant]]
- [[Brown dwarf]]
- [[Planet classification]]
